CHỮA ĐỀ THI THẬT BAND 8.0+ IELTS WRITING TASK 2 NGÀY 10/8/2024

ESSAY INFORMATION:

Written by: IELTS I-Ready, 12/8/2024

Marked by: Ex-BC Examiner

(IELTS Academic – 10/8/2024)

Question: Government should invest in teaching science subjects rather than other subjects for country development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

ANSWER:

When considering the role of education in national development, some argue that the government should prioritize investing in the science curriculum over other disciplines. While there is merit in emphasizing science education due to its direct impact on technological and economic advancement, I mostly disagree with this opinion because I believe that a more balanced approach that includes non-science subjects is essential for comprehensive progress.

The primary justification for my opposition is that this viewpoint overlooks the critical contributions of non-science subjects to society. Subjects like history, literature, and the arts play a crucial role in shaping well-rounded individuals who can think critically, communicate effectively, and understand complex social dynamics. For example, history provides insight into past events, helping societies avoid repeating mistakes, while literature fosters empathy and creativity. These skills are vital for nurturing informed and engaged citizens who can contribute to social cohesion and democratic governance.

Additionally, the interdisciplinary nature of modern challenges requires solutions that integrate both scientific and non-scientific perspectives. A solution that is purely scientific might overlook important human factors, leading to ineffective or unsustainable outcomes. By investing in a broad range of subjects, the authorities can ensure that its citizens are equipped to tackle complex problems from multiple angles, leading to more holistic and sustainable development.

Granted, I concede that science subjects offer significant benefits for a country’s development. Scientific disciplines like engineering, medicine, and information technology are at the heart of innovation and economic growth. For instance, advancements in technology drive industries such as manufacturing, healthcare, and telecommunications, leading to job creation and increased productivity. By focusing on science education, the government can equip its workforce with the skills necessary to compete globally, fostering a stronger economy and improving the nation’s standard of living.

In conclusion, while investing in science subjects is undoubtedly important for national development, since it nurtures the advancement of various sectors, I predominantly contend that it should not come at the expense of other disciplines. These fields are essential for nourishing well-rounded individuals and of equal vitality in addressing the diverse challenges facing modern society. 

(346 words)

Highlight Vocabulary: